Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

interpersonal communication

  • dara_like_sara avatar

    What outcome do you hope for? I was on a call for the last hour talking with a friend about supporting a vision he has. 

    At the end of the call, he asked "what are you hoping to get out of this?"

    I found the question really hard to answer in a way that makes any sense at all.

    My answer to the questions comes in feelings, images, and body sensations. I see a bowl overflowing, I feel a magnetic pull, I experience a sense of duty, I follow synchronicities, I release and this is what came to me. One of my purposes in this life is to bring people together, especially really smart people. I don't have a goal, and if I did, I am sure it would change. I want to be of service to a vision of the best future possible.

    I'm after the experience. My vision will fill out along the way. 

    When I can't frame the answer in an intelligible way, it causes doubt- maybe this isn't right? Maybe my intuition would have a clearer answer if this were the right path. Maybe I'm cutoff from what outcomes I hope for and need to work on getting more in touch with my desires. Am I too scared to name a desired outcome for fear of being letdown if it doesn't come true?

    But I want to try on that the question may just be the wrong question for me. Or that my answer to the question isn't going to sound like what I've heard from other people. 

    Sharing here, and open to others experience of answering this question. How do you know what you want? 

    And if you know me, happy to hear your perspective on my specific psychology or what you think is going on 🤔

    dara_like_saraSA•...

    Oh interesting! What ulterior motives do you think he may have been projecting on me? 

    psychology
    relationships
    interpersonal communication
    attribution theory
    Comments
    0
  • dara_like_sara avatar

    What outcome do you hope for? I was on a call for the last hour talking with a friend about supporting a vision he has. 

    At the end of the call, he asked "what are you hoping to get out of this?"

    I found the question really hard to answer in a way that makes any sense at all.

    My answer to the questions comes in feelings, images, and body sensations. I see a bowl overflowing, I feel a magnetic pull, I experience a sense of duty, I follow synchronicities, I release and this is what came to me. One of my purposes in this life is to bring people together, especially really smart people. I don't have a goal, and if I did, I am sure it would change. I want to be of service to a vision of the best future possible.

    I'm after the experience. My vision will fill out along the way. 

    When I can't frame the answer in an intelligible way, it causes doubt- maybe this isn't right? Maybe my intuition would have a clearer answer if this were the right path. Maybe I'm cutoff from what outcomes I hope for and need to work on getting more in touch with my desires. Am I too scared to name a desired outcome for fear of being letdown if it doesn't come true?

    But I want to try on that the question may just be the wrong question for me. Or that my answer to the question isn't going to sound like what I've heard from other people. 

    Sharing here, and open to others experience of answering this question. How do you know what you want? 

    And if you know me, happy to hear your perspective on my specific psychology or what you think is going on 🤔

    CoachWebb13•...

    Sounds like your friend thought you might have ulterior motives. Maybe they are not confident in their vision 

    social psychology
    interpersonal communication
    friendship and trust
    Comments
    0
  • angle•...
    Large Scale societal cooperation begins with small scale relational skills. If we can't talk honestly with our partners, children or neighbors it becomes unrealistic to expect productive dialogue at political/insituional levels....
    social psychology
    conflict resolution
    interpersonal communication
    civic engagement
    community building
    Comments
    0
  • sness•...

    Science Says: Have Deeper Conversations

    Hi again UpTrust! I'm Sara Ness, Resident Research Nerd (aka Research Director) at the social health nonprofit SeekHealing, CEO of Authentic Revolution, and co-founder of the OG Austin Authentic Relating and Circling communities....
    social psychology
    behavioral science
    interpersonal communication
    vulnerability and emotional openness
    Comments
    0
  • Shera JoyCry avatar

    Beyond Inner Work: Relational Awareness and the Practice of Relateful Personal development trains inner awareness. Relateful trains relational awareness. Beyond Inner Work: Relational Awareness and the Practice of Relateful

    Personal development trains inner awareness.
    Relateful trains relational awareness.

    Abstract

    Personal development has grown into a massive global industry, with millions of people engaging in meditation, therapy, retreats, breathwork, and other modalities aimed at emotional healing and personal growth. These practices often cultivate powerful insight and personal transformation. Yet much of human challenge and growth occurs not in solitude but in relationship. When people return from transformative experiences to their everyday interactions with partners, colleagues, and communities, the clarity they experienced internally can become difficult to maintain within the complexity of live human interaction.

    Relateful can be understood as a practice that addresses this gap by bringing awareness directly into relational experience. Rather than focusing solely on inner experience, Relateful invites participants to observe sensations, triggers, perceptions, and shifts in relational connection as they arise during real-time interaction with others. In this way, it offers a potential mechanism through which insights cultivated in inner transformation practices may become embodied within the dynamic and often activating context of relational life. This paper explores Relateful as a relational awareness practice that may help integrate inner transformation with the realities of live human interaction, potentially extending and stabilizing the effects of personal development practices within everyday relationships.

    1.   Introduction: The Rise of Inner Work

    Inner awareness is widely trained. Relational awareness is not. Relateful provides a way to practice it.
    While many contemporary practices train inner awareness, the capacity to remain aware within relationship is far less explicitly cultivated. Relateful offers a context in which this relational awareness can be practiced.

    Many contemporary approaches to personal growth provide powerful tools for self-reflection. Meditation cultivates the ability to observe thoughts and emotions. Psychotherapy often helps individuals recognize patterns formed through past experiences. Somatic and mindfulness-based practices develop sensitivity to bodily sensations and nervous system regulation. These methods can generate profound insight and emotional healing.

    From this perspective, Relateful does not seek to replace existing modalities of healing or personal development. Instead, it can be understood as an addition—extending these approaches into a domain where many individuals experience their greatest challenges: real-time interaction with others. Emotional reactions may become visible earlier, interpretations may be held with greater curiosity, and moments of tension may be approached with awareness rather than automatic reaction.

    This distinction suggests that relational awareness may represent a complementary developmental capacity within the broader landscape of personal growth. Practices that cultivate inner awareness can provide essential foundations for self-understanding and emotional regulation. Relational practices, by contrast, offer opportunities to explore how those internal processes operate when multiple perspectives, emotions, and interpretations interact simultaneously.

    When individuals develop the capacity to notice their internal responses while remaining engaged with another person in real time, new possibilities may emerge within relationships, communities, and the broader social systems those relationships collectively form. In this sense, personal development practices often cultivate inner awareness, while relational practices such as Relateful cultivate awareness within interaction itself.

     

    2. The Relational Gap in Personal Development

    Much of contemporary personal development is designed to help individuals cultivate awareness within their own internal experience. Practices such as meditation, yoga, psychotherapy, breathwork, journaling, and visualization invite participants to observe their thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations in relatively reflective environments. In these contexts, individuals can pause, reflect, and gradually develop greater familiarity with their internal patterns.

    Many of these practices can produce profound insights. Participants frequently report moments of clarity, peace, forgiveness, or emotional release that reshape how they understand their lives. Entire industries have emerged around facilitating these experiences through retreats, workshops, coaching programs, and therapeutic models.

    However, a familiar pattern often emerges when individuals return from powerful personal development experiences to everyday life. Insights that feel transformative in solitude can become difficult to maintain once people re-enter the complexity of human relationships.

    Group experiences such as retreats or seminars can generate powerful feelings of connection or cohesion, yet participants are usually engaged in the same activity together—meditating, listening to a teacher, or following a guided process. These experiences can be meaningful and supportive, but the primary focus often remains on the individual’s internal experience rather than the interaction unfolding between participants.

    In Relateful spaces, the emphasis shifts. Participants are not attempting to synchronize behavior or reach a shared emotional state. Instead, individuals remain rooted in their own experience while interacting directly with others. The practice invites participants to notice sensations in the body, emotional responses, interpretations, and shifts in connection as they arise during real-time interaction.

    As a result, awareness that may feel accessible in solitude can become significantly more difficult to maintain during live interpersonal exchange. Subtle facial expressions, tone of voice, perceived judgments, or shifts in attention can rapidly activate emotional and physiological responses.

    Recognizing a pattern through reflection does not necessarily mean a person will remain aware when that pattern unfolds in live interaction with others, where human relationships are dynamic and unpredictable.

     

    3. Relateful as a Practice

    Relateful is a relational awareness practice that explores what unfolds when human beings interact in real time. While many personal development practices cultivate awareness within the individual, Relateful also includes the relational dimension through which experience emerges. This creates opportunities to observe how perception, emotion, interpretation, and connection shift within real-time interaction, and how our ways of relating to these moments shape the quality of our relationships both within the practice and in everyday relationships.

    For many individuals engaged in personal development—including myself—the search for growth often begins as an inward journey of understanding one’s own patterns and history. This process can lead to meaningful insight and the ability to recognize relational patterns after they occur. Yet in my own experience, years of self-reflection did not automatically change how I responded in emotionally activating interactions with others. The capacity to remain aware in those moments began to shift more noticeably through relational practice.

    In Relateful settings, participants bring awareness to their present-moment experience while engaging with others. This may include noticing sensations, emotions, shifts in attention, interpretations that arise within interaction, and other aspects of experience that become visible through awareness. Participants may share personal stories or reflections, yet the emphasis remains on noticing what occurs as those stories are spoken and received. Through this process, relational experience itself becomes visible as participants observe how connection, interpretation, and emotional responses unfold in real time.

    Rather than emphasizing analysis of past experiences or explanations of personal history, the practice centers on what is unfolding within and between participants during live interaction. Over time, this can cultivate a growing attunement to what is occurring within oneself, within others, and within the shared relational process.

    As this sensitivity develops, participants explore how their perceptions, emotional responses, and patterns of communication participate in the unfolding interaction. In this way, attention shifts from focusing solely on individual experience to observing the relational dynamics that emerge between participants in real time.

     

    4. Implications for Personal Development

    The emergence of practices such as Relateful raises an important question for the broader field of personal development: what happens when awareness is practiced not only internally, but within live relationship?

    In this way, relational awareness practices may help bridge the gap between personal insight and relational behavior. By bringing attention to what occurs within interaction itself, they offer a practical context in which individuals can explore how awareness functions within the living dynamics of human relationship.

    In this sense, Relateful functions less as a technique designed to produce predetermined outcomes and more as a context in which relational processes become visible. As individuals repeatedly bring awareness to what unfolds within interaction, certain capacities may gradually develop.

    Participants often report increased ability to notice emotional activation as it arises, rather than becoming immediately absorbed in reactive patterns. The moment between stimulus and response can become more visible, creating greater space for choice in how one responds within relationship.

    As this awareness deepens, participants frequently describe increased empathy and curiosity toward others’ perspectives. Instead of interpreting relational tension solely through personal assumptions, individuals may begin to recognize the multiple interpretations that can arise within interaction. This expanded awareness can make it easier to remain present with disagreement, emotional intensity, or misunderstanding without immediately withdrawing or escalating conflict.

    Relational awareness may also support greater nervous system regulation within interpersonal situations. Rather than attempting to eliminate emotional activation, individuals learn to remain aware of sensations, emotions, and interpretations while continuing to engage with others. This capacity can allow moments of tension, discomfort, or disconnection to become opportunities for understanding rather than triggers for automatic defensive reactions.

    In this way, relational awareness practices may gradually influence how individuals participate in everyday relationships. Conversations that previously led to misunderstanding or reactivity may begin to unfold with greater patience, reflection, and openness. Individuals may become more aware of how their own perceptions and emotional responses shape relational dynamics, allowing relationships to evolve through increased mutual understanding.

    From this perspective, Relateful does not replace existing forms of personal development but complements them. Practices that cultivate inner awareness provide essential foundations for self-understanding. Relational practices extend this work by offering environments in which awareness can be explored within the living dynamics of human interaction itself.

    A particularly revealing moment within relational awareness practices occurs when a subtle sense of separation begins to form between participants. A comment may be heard as criticism, a facial expression may be perceived as judgment, or an assumption about another person's intention may arise. In these moments, individuals can begin to experience the other person less as a complex human being and more as an idea, a role, or a perceived threat. This shift—from relating with another person to reacting to an internal interpretation—can occur rapidly and often outside of conscious awareness. Within relational awareness practices, these moments become important opportunities for observation. By noticing the moment in which another person begins to appear as “other,” participants may begin to recognize how perception, emotion, and interpretation combine to shape relational experience in real time.


    5. Why Relational Awareness Matters Now

    Public discourse in many contexts has become increasingly reactive and polarized. Conversations about social change, cultural values, or political identity can quickly escalate into defensiveness or withdrawal. Individuals may find themselves strongly attached to particular viewpoints or group identities, leaving little room for curiosity about how others arrived at different conclusions. In such environments, it can become difficult for people to remain aware of their own emotional responses while also listening carefully to others.

    Relational awareness practices offer an opportunity to explore how these dynamics unfold within interaction itself. By bringing attention to sensations, emotional activation, and interpretations as they arise during conversation, individuals may begin to recognize how quickly assumptions form and how strongly emotional responses shape perception of others. This awareness can help interrupt habitual reactions and patterns of emotional dysregulation. Rather than attempting to eliminate disagreement, these practices encourage participants to remain aware of their internal responses while continuing to engage with the other person.

    A key element of relational awareness involves developing what might be described as dual awareness: the ability to remain connected to one's own internal experience while simultaneously remaining present with another person. Participants are not asked to abandon their perspective or merge with the group. Instead, they practice noticing their own sensations, emotions, and interpretations while continuing to relate.

    Within this framework, moments of emotional activation or relational tension are not treated as problems that must immediately be resolved. Instead, they become opportunities to observe how relational patterns arise. A surge of irritation, confusion, or distance can be explored with curiosity rather than reacted to automatically. Even moments of disconnection can become meaningful elements of the relational process, revealing how connection and separation move dynamically within human interaction.

    One reason relational awareness practices may be particularly valuable is that much of human suffering and misunderstanding emerges not only from individual psychology but from the interaction between people. Perception, emotion, interpretation, and response continually shape one another within relationship. When these processes remain unconscious, patterns of misunderstanding and reactivity can repeat across families, organizations, and societies. Practices that bring attention to these relational dynamics offer an opportunity to observe how these patterns form and how awareness itself may shift the quality of interaction. In this sense, relational awareness is not simply a personal skill but a way of understanding how human experience is continuously co-created within relationship.

    In a world characterized by rapid communication, cultural diversity, and increasingly complex social systems, the capacity to remain aware within relationship may represent an increasingly valuable human skill. Practices that cultivate relational awareness invite individuals to explore not only how they experience themselves internally, but how their perceptions, emotions, and interpretations participate in shaping the quality of human interaction. In this sense, relational awareness may represent an important next frontier in the continuing evolution of personal development.

    6. Relational Awareness in Psychology and Science

    The emphasis on relational awareness explored in Relateful also reflects a broader shift occurring across multiple fields of psychology, neuroscience, and systems theory. While many early models of psychology focused primarily on the individual mind, contemporary research increasingly recognizes that human experience is deeply shaped by relational and social processes.

    For this reason, relational awareness can be understood as a distinct developmental capacity within human social cognition. It involves noticing not only one’s internal sensations and emotions, but also the dynamic interplay between internal experience and interaction with others. This includes recognizing shifts in attention, emotional activation, interpretations about another person’s intentions, and the subtle movement between connection and disconnection that can occur moment to moment in human interaction.

    Developing this kind of awareness can be difficult in ordinary social environments, where the primary goal of conversation is often to exchange information, solve problems, or defend positions. The pace of interaction frequently leaves little space to observe the internal processes shaping the interaction itself.

    Psychological research has long noted that human perception within relationships is shaped not only by present events but also by prior experiences and expectations. Individuals frequently interpret others through lenses formed by past relationships, cultural narratives, and internalized beliefs. These interpretations can occur automatically, often before a person becomes consciously aware that they are happening.

    Researchers studying interpersonal regulation have shown that emotional states are continuously influenced by interaction with others. Facial expression, tone of voice, posture, and attention all contribute to subtle forms of nervous system synchronization between individuals. In neuroscience and interpersonal neurobiology, researchers have described this process as co-regulation, in which emotional states are continuously shaped through interaction with others (Porges; Schore; Siegel).

    Similarly, relational and family systems approaches in psychology emphasize that behavior and emotional responses frequently arise within patterns of interaction rather than solely within individuals. Family systems therapy, for example, views many forms of psychological distress as emerging from relational dynamics within families or social groups. From this perspective, understanding a person's experience often requires examining the patterns of communication and feedback occurring between people.

    Systems theory more broadly has contributed the insight that complex phenomena frequently emerge from the interaction of multiple elements within a system rather than from any single component alone. Human relationships can therefore be understood as dynamic systems in which perception, emotion, and behavior continuously influence one another.

    Relational awareness practices therefore provide a context in which individuals can observe how these regulatory dynamics unfold in real time. Participants may begin to notice how their internal state shifts in response to another person's presence, attention, or emotional expression. By bringing awareness to these interactions, relational practices may help individuals develop greater sensitivity to the processes through which human nervous systems continuously influence one another.

    Within this evolving scientific landscape, practices that cultivate awareness within relational interaction may play an important role. While traditional personal development approaches often emphasize self-awareness, relational awareness practices invite individuals to observe how experience unfolds within interaction itself. This perspective aligns with emerging views in psychology and neuroscience that emphasize the relational and socially embedded nature of human cognition and emotional life.

    In this context, Relateful can be understood as a practical environment in which individuals explore relational awareness directly. By observing sensations, interpretations, and shifts in connection as they arise during interaction, participants develop greater sensitivity to the relational processes through which human experience is continuously co-created in interaction.

    7. Conclusion: From Inner Work to Relational Practice

    Over the past several decades, the field of personal development has generated an extraordinary range of methods for cultivating self-awareness and emotional healing. Meditation, therapy, somatic practices, and transformational programs have helped many individuals gain insight into their thoughts, emotions, and behavioral patterns. These approaches have contributed significantly to the understanding of how individuals can regulate their internal experience and reshape long-standing psychological patterns.

    Yet much of human life unfolds not in solitude but in relationship. Interactions with partners, colleagues, family members, and communities introduce layers of complexity that can challenge the stability of insights developed in more controlled or reflective environments. Emotional activation, interpretation, and interpersonal signaling occur rapidly during live interaction, often making it difficult to remain aware of one's internal processes while also responding to others.

    Relateful represents an approach that brings awareness directly into this relational domain. By inviting participants to observe sensations, emotions, interpretations, and shifts in connection as they arise during interaction, the practice offers a context in which relational processes themselves can become visible. Rather than replacing other modalities of personal development, relational awareness practices may extend them by providing environments in which individuals can explore how awareness functions within the dynamics of human relationship over time.

     

    As the field of personal development continues to evolve, practices that cultivate awareness not only within the individual but also within the relational field may play an increasingly important role. Developing the capacity to remain aware while interacting with others may help bridge the gap between personal insight and relational behavior, allowing the benefits of inner work to become more fully integrated into everyday relationships.

    In this sense, personal development practices often cultivate inner awareness, while relational practices such as Relateful cultivate awareness within interaction itself—where many of the misunderstandings, conflicts, and possibilities that shape human life actually unfold. If personal development has largely focused on cultivating inner awareness, relational practices such as Relateful invite the next step: learning to remain aware within relationship itself.

    Shera JoyCryinROAR: Research in Applied Relatefulness - Journal Submissions & discussion•...
    From Intensify Bot: "Thanks for sharing the doc — I’ll read it. Could you briefly summarize the A: core Relateful practice steps and B: any evidence or participant outcomes you’ve observed?"    While different facilitators may describe the process in slightly different ways, the...
    mindfulness and meditation
    interpersonal communication
    emotion regulation and nervous system regulation
    psychotherapy and counseling
    relateful practice
    Comments
    0
  • J
    Circling = Relatefulness? For a few years it has bugged me when people call Relatefulness "Circling."
    In Tuscon a few months ago I shared some of my frustrations.
    I also shared my annoyance at a recent retreat and gathering in Charlotte.
    Both times I was met with surprise and curiosity.
    People were surprised: “aren’t they the same?”
    People were curious: “why do I think they are different, and why does it annoy me?”
    Deep down, it's definitely connected with wanting to feel special and be different.
    And, I often see people who conflate "Circling" and "Relatefulness" miss unique aspects of each.
    Many Circling practitioners preference body sensations over thoughts, exclude stories or memories, and preference raw expression over attunement.
    Relatefulness includes both body sensations and thoughts, preferencing which is more alive. Stories and memories are cherished and celebrated when timed properly. Attunement and relational impact are held as essential to practicing relational presence alongside authenticity.
    I’m not saying Circling is bad. I’ve seen those perspectives unlock powerful insights and shifts in being.
    But I definitely am biased. For me right now, I continue to find what I see as a more inclusive, human, caring container as a better representation of what I want to be moving towards. And I’m also holding any judgements lightly, recognizing that I also just really enjoy the people who I get to practice Relatefulness with, and my judgements of "circling" are definitely missing lots of nuance.
    And maybe Relatefulness is "Circling". I'm not sure exactly how definitions work.
    But I do know that I really value the practice of Relatefulness.
    PS: I feel party inspired by a post Joshua Zader made a few years ago where he shared "I now see “relatefulness” as the name for that wider life practice, which both transcends and includes circling and authentic relating, as skill-building exercises." https://www.relateful.com/.../what-does-it-mean-to-be...
    Andrew23•...
    Here's my thumb-nail definition of "Circling": a Circle is a shape where every point on the periphery is equidistant from the centre. Cricling is a style of dialoguing which uses a wide variety of language structures, many coming from the worlds of therapy and encounter groups,...
    psychology
    interpersonal communication
    group therapy
    self help personal development
    Comments
    0
  • sooyounglee369 avatar

    I don't feel very creative or safe lately. Lately, so much of what I write or create feels meaningless with the current state of affairs in the background, humming like a constant threat.

    I have scrapped so much content, and I usually tend to create for the practice of creating.

    Then my older son asked me, “Uhma are you writing about what you are feeling + dealing with?”

    That’s when I realized I have been busy numbing myself -a type of disassociation or distracting myself to avoid the overwhelm.

    Some thoughts:

    1) A level of safety if necessary to create

    2) Safety can also be found within through practice + discernment

    3) Sometimes, we must not run from the fear we feel but toward it to understand

    3) Sometimes, because we don’t feel safe, we need speak on that.

    Confession: I don’t feel safe lately.

    In process: I am building an inner sanctuary of safety to face my fears.

    sooyounglee369•...

    Wow, how beautiful is that? I am so thankful you shared this with me. I think it is so important to make sure we are walking our talk or walking our writing in this case. 

    interpersonal communication
    gratitude
    writing and authenticity
    Comments
    0
  • F

    Engage or Enrage. It is likely that we have family members or friends that we differ with greatly when it comes to politics, healthcare, etc.  I am no different.  When the inevitable hot topic arises, do you recommend flight or fight, engage or enrage?  How do you respond when this occurs?

    jordanSA•...

    love this, thanks for sharing. Making it personal is so effective because it's real and doesn't demand that the other person change. It's just a genuine opening to connection

    psychology
    relationships
    interpersonal communication
    Comments
    0
  • annabeth avatar

    UpTrust is both destroying my interest in other social media platforms and improving the way I interact with them.

    It became blatant to me this week when I realized my screen time limits had long since stopped popping up for social media. I would open an app, look at up to 5 things, feel an "ugh," and go do something else.

    More and more in conversations I've been saying, "I just wrote a post about that on UpTrust!" an more and more the reply is, "How can I get on it??"

    I've never much been tempted to share and/or elaborate on my opinions anywhere on the internet. But I have been interested in posting them here, and my reason keeps being that it feels like the algorithm has my back. After I post an opinion here, the likelihood that something generative and worthwhile will happen feels way higher here. Even when I imagine a bunch of buttholes joining.

    Earlier today, something happened that I totally had not forseen. I replied to a Facebook post I was tagged in that I've been annoyed by and avoiding for months. And I replied the way I'd reply here- thoroughly, thoughtfully, with a belief that it could be worth my time and energy. I think UpTrust is giving me a lot of practice at typing what matters to me in this kind of format, and my increased skill is getting paid forward to other parts of life.

    PS- I keep wanting to type "algorhythm" because of my music background, but anyway it's an amazing name for a math rock band.

    taurus12•...

    "Count" me in ! I'm having similar experiences! 

    interpersonal communication
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust Admin avatar

    AMA with Hannah Aline Taylor. Wednesday 2/4 at 4:00 PM CT

    love, boundaries, and mistakes in relating, community, and peopling together (+ thank god love doesn’t look like you expect it to)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNYNL05PRBQ
    Hannah Aline Taylor•...

    YES. I like to say relationships are context not meant to be content. 

    interpersonal communication
    philosophy of relationships
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust Admin avatar

    AMA with Hannah Aline Taylor. Wednesday 2/4 at 4:00 PM CT

    love, boundaries, and mistakes in relating, community, and peopling together (+ thank god love doesn’t look like you expect it to)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNYNL05PRBQ
    JulieI•...

    What's your quantum understanding of communication then? The responsibility for the interaction lies somewhere. Only with the speaker?

    interpersonal communication
    quantum communication
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust Admin avatar

    AMA with Hannah Aline Taylor. Wednesday 2/4 at 4:00 PM CT

    love, boundaries, and mistakes in relating, community, and peopling together (+ thank god love doesn’t look like you expect it to)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNYNL05PRBQ
    lyssa•...

    Is it easy for both of you to say I love you? How? (as in, it's not easy for a lot of people)

    relationships
    interpersonal communication
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust Admin avatar

    Incorruptible Organizations AMA with Eric Ries. Wednesday 2/4 at 3:00 PM CT

    Lean Startup author who now focuses on legal structures to protect mission-driven organizations from corruption. incorruptible.co

    Free book giveaway! Register here.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNfb54LuzwI
    jordanSA•...

    How you feeling? Where do you sit on this topic?

    emotional intelligence
    interpersonal communication
    Comments
    0
  • F

    Engage or Enrage. It is likely that we have family members or friends that we differ with greatly when it comes to politics, healthcare, etc.  I am no different.  When the inevitable hot topic arises, do you recommend flight or fight, engage or enrage?  How do you respond when this occurs?

    jordanSA•...
    i love this question, and I think it's a tricky one. On the one hand, enrage almost never goes somewhere I actually want to go. It just deepens the divide. On the other hand, i deeply value being able to connect on differing opinions, I think it's how we grow....
    psychology
    emotional intelligence
    conflict resolution
    interpersonal communication
    Comments
    0
  • TRG•...

    The Math of a Good Transaction

    Hey, Hi, Hello. New to the floor here. I’m TRG. In my world, we usually talk about "Edge" and "Variance" in terms of chips and cards. But looking around this place, I see the same math applies to how we talk to each other....
    philosophy
    interpersonal communication
    risk management
    Comments
    1
  • Robbie Carlton•...

    Personal and Interpersonal Action

    This is a distinction I make a lot with my coaching clients.  1) Action is good.  Having epiphanies, emotional breakthroughs, insights etc, all of that is great, and occasionally life changing....
    personal development
    psychology
    interpersonal communication
    coaching
    self-improvement
    Comments
    0
  • R

    Helping my mom ease into AI. I'm thinking about helping my elderly mom get set up with Claude or ChatGPT. (Free ChatGPT allows more usage even after the limit has been reached. This could be a bonus for her.) 

    She has suggested interest in it a couple months ago and has not mentioned it again since. AI can be so helpful if used well! I am at her home this week. If I set her up now, I can help her navigate it for the next days before I go home. 

    I'm concerned she might use AI to medically self-diagnose or lose skepticism and take answers as facts. Claude has a "personal preferences" area where I could write some instructions on how to engage. With Chat you can enter that into a thread but I've noticed it can forget instructions from other threads. 

    She doesn't work so won't use AI for projects. She'll likely use it to ask about health concerns, which supplements to buy, getting help with emails or letters, help with doing things around the house (like how to clean her air purifier, or create recipes). She might ask questions about politics. 

    Can any of you with AI expertise give me suggestions?

    1. Go wtih Claude or ChatGPT? 
    2. Any instructions I can enter as preferences so she is less likely to act on misinformation? There's the thing about limiting the compliments too. 
    3. Any other suggestions I am not considering? 

    I'm grateful for any help you can offer!

    renee•...

    OK, thanks for your input, Isaac. I left without introducing it to her. <3  

    relationships
    interpersonal communication
    Comments
    0
  • jordan avatar

    when are masculine / feminine frames useful, and when not?  Language can bring us into more intimacy with reality, or separate us. It can help guide us, or obfuscate. How do we use "masculine" and "feminine" to be more intimate with the real (present), more honest, and more loving?

    The 'masculine' and 'feminine' meaning-making about relationships annoys me often. Not so much when either is used by itself. These archetypes are powerful frames, better navigated in the light of consciousness. Both exist in me, along with a lot of other things.

    I get the importance of biology too—"male and female" is what, like 2 billion years old? That's a lot of accumulated lineage karma in our DNA.

    When it bugs me, it's not because its wrong or particularly fake—almost every parent that's not ideologically committed to a preconceived notion of gender notices some standard differences amongst young boys and young girls. Jack is so sensitive, but he also loves to pick up sticks and hit things. Ciça is so tough, but she also loves dolls and stuffed animals and her baby cousin Sanne. Jack doesn't really care about any of that stuff—Sanne is boring. Ciça lights up.

    But I wonder if the heart of it is that I'm just scared of reifying black and white thinking. This kind of thinking seems to make people celebratory of killing or subjecting whoever the other tribe is. I can see that this frame—

    • is often used to oversimplify
    • often presents a false sense of control over a wildly chaotic world
    • the categories are usually not clear, and often insulting, usually to the incredible women I know (like women are somehow less "rational" bc they're more "emotional"? This does not reflect the brilliant women and men I know, and literally all of the trans people I know are geniuses. Similar with intellectual/embodied, independence/connection, competition/harmony, etc)
    • often pluralizes values instead of evaluating better and worse versions of any given polarity, or being willing to claim one side as being overall better. There is healthier and more toxic versions of chaos and order, for example.

    I'm noticing the frame annoys me often as "masculine and feminine" in relationship, not so much when either is used by itself. That's interesting.

    I realized after writing this another thing that bugs me is when they're taken too seriously. This isn't physics, and even then construct-awareness reveals reality entangled with the choice of how you look—I dont even mean quantum physics, I mean as literal as "what are you seeing right now from your eyes?" Whether it's light, or a screen, or atoms, or quarks, all depend on scale. Whether it's society, or the information age, or whatever, are all honest, accurate interpretations based on time, or purpose, or some other choice the subjective meaning-maker made in how to answer the question and engage/relate.

    I guess I don't mind the frame so much as the assumption that it's somehow pre-existing rather than made and re-made. It is a well-worn groove, but ironically the self-help understanding of it is fairly new.

    #masculinity 

    blasomenessphemy•...
    I noticed I got interested and thought, "Why does Jordan want to get to the heart of it?" I'm really curious about your annoyance as an early warning system....
    psychology
    interpersonal communication
    Comments
    0
  • L

    Austin's Proposition Q - A misleading text that really grinds my gears. I've received multiple texts from various groups with this language:

    We can debate the merits of Proposition Q separately; what I am worked up about is the absolutely false language about "Trump cuts" to city services like fire, EMS, parks, etc. The federal government doesn't fund municipal services*. The federal government shouldn't fund municipal services, and in fact our fire, EMS, and police being independent of the federal government is a fundamental part of states' rights or how our government is intentionally structured. EVEN if I don't support defunding the police, it was absolutely within Austin's right to do so, and that had nothing to do with federal funding. 

    *there are grants that impact some of these services, like the transportation grant Trump did cancel that would include parks over the new I-35, but that is not fundamentally a park funding grant.

    blasomenessphemy•...

    I'm surprised this grinds your gears.

    interpersonal communication
    emotions and psychology
    Comments
    0
  • Shera JoyCry avatar

    Being With. What how do we explain relateful? How is it different than Authentic relating, circling and T Group? 

    Back story, Circle Anywhere- Relateful have changed my life in ways -no other tools has ever come close... AND I CAN't ARTICULATE how and why!

    One way it makes sense to me is that through relateful practices - learned to separate from the story by noticing present based things such as sensations, connections to other etc..  

    So when explaining to others who are suffering in life and want change but haven't heard of relateful.. Words can not cover my life changing experiences.  Closest at the moment is disccusing how i learned how to be with anger instead of BEING angry. 

    BUT - YES AND - does that land with people who don't do relateful or circling and have never heard of authentic relating etc.  

    There are layers and many ways this practice create lasting positive change.  I know from personal experience it works, but what is the IT?!!!

    Staying at the level of sensation is a great tool for staying in present moment, but also, by doing so, it creates the habit of noticing what is happening in the body when the nervous system in dis-regulated.  This habit of noticing, on top of the practice in a group - of being with emotional disregulation/anger - being asked "what's that like" and having the opportunity to explain how anger feels - little tiny knives attempting to exit the skin from within to the the outside = painful physically.  

    This pause - checking the sensations - NOT going into the "why am i angry" seems to be a huge life changing piece of the puzzle.  As anger arises, noticing the sensations and letting the story of the anger take a back seat - now there is agency on acting out the anger.  The anger doesn't take me away on a journey of dissipating the energy by taking it out on others.   I do still get angry, but how i express it is changed.   It's like being with anger instead of BEING ANGRY!

    AND THAT IS JUST ONE OF MANY STORIES - can do similar with shame, with self hate, with so much more.

     

    BUT HOW DO I SHARE THIS WITH OTHERS?  

     

    Would love to know!

    jordanSA•...
    I think this is a very difficult question! (Would love to hear @nat's thoughts, but also anyones!). My first thought is "we don't assume the individual is the atomic center of experience, we assume relating is." T-Group and AR, and to maybe even some extent circling, are...
    psychology
    interpersonal communication
    self-improvement
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...